|
|
Post by Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger on Aug 17, 2019 0:38:48 GMT
Fedspeak: the practice of answering questions about the economy in a manner that makes it sound as though the question was answered, when in reality it was not. Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger: needs to practice Fedspeak for a thing he's gonna do on another site. So, to help me, could y'all ask me questions about economic stuff, or stuff in general, so I can answer them in Fedspeak?
|
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Aug 17, 2019 1:04:26 GMT
Is the sinking prime lending rate going to have an effect on the Silicon Valley's startups, industry-wide speaking?
[Insert a wink/tongue combo emoji here as in tongue-in-cheek]
|
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Aug 17, 2019 1:12:23 GMT
Is the current purchasing power parity situation (or PPP) favoring or singling out among those 6: USA+BRICS for a turn of good fortunes? And any of those 6 for the bad as well?   |
|
|
|
Post by Victor Katz on Aug 17, 2019 2:39:10 GMT
*Tags Tolbethessar* This is pretty political, and if you think this is inappropriate, I will remove the question immediately. What opinion do you have about the China-US Trade war, and do you think it will have a positive impact in the global economy in the long run? |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger on Aug 17, 2019 2:52:07 GMT
Is the sinking prime lending rate going to have an effect on the Silicon Valley's startups, industry-wide speaking? [Insert a wink/tongue combo emoji here as in tongue-in-cheek] I believe the decrease in the prime will have an expansionary effect on the economy at large, which will have various effects on a variety of sectors. The startup economy, in particular, appears to make accommodations for itself, and I predict it will do so for a considerable time. Is the current purchasing power parity situation (or PPP) favoring or singling out among those 6: USA+BRICS for a turn of good fortunes? And any of those 6 for the bad as well? The PPP rises and falls, dependent on an assortment of factors throughout the economy. Its current position is likely to be affected by data-dependent actions from a variety of actors. *Tags Tolbethessar * This is pretty political, and if you think this is inappropriate, I will remove the question immediately. What opinion do you have about the China-US Trade war, and do you think it will have a positive impact in the global economy in the long run? It is my perception that the US-China trade war may have an assortment of both short- and long-term effects on the economy. I would be patient and see how the data evolves, rather than embrace irrational exuberance on this topic.
That was fun! |
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Aug 17, 2019 2:52:36 GMT
*Tags Tolbethessar* This is pretty political, and if you think this is inappropriate, I will remove the question immediately. What opinion do you have about the China-US Trade war, and do you think it will have a positive impact in the global economy in the long run? I assume it's slightly okay-not-okay long as Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger isn't really answering it as in "the practice of answering questions about the economy in a manner that makes it sound as though the question was answered, when in reality it was not." Considering it all as a joke, perhaps? EDIT: There you go, Victor Katz.  lol |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger on Aug 17, 2019 3:02:00 GMT
*Tags Tolbethessar * This is pretty political, and if you think this is inappropriate, I will remove the question immediately. What opinion do you have about the China-US Trade war, and do you think it will have a positive impact in the global economy in the long run? I assume it's slightly okay-not-okay long as Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger isn't really answering it as in "the practice of answering questions about the economy in a manner that makes it sound as though the question was answered, when in reality it was not." Considering it all as a joke, perhaps? EDIT: There you go, Victor Katz . lol I believe that, with matters as they are, we should take a measured, patient approach to this matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Aug 17, 2019 20:02:47 GMT
I assume it's slightly okay-not-okay long as Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger isn't really answering it as in "the practice of answering questions about the economy in a manner that makes it sound as though the question was answered, when in reality it was not." Considering it all as a joke, perhaps? EDIT: There you go, Victor Katz . lol I believe that, with matters as they are, we should take a measured, patient approach to this matter. I'm flexible and easy to work with, but let's limit the skirting to a reasonable minimum. The more people flirt with the line, missteps become likeier and likeier*. *Is likeier even a real word? I'm sure there HAS to be something, but it's looking funny to me. Misspelling, probably. |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger on Aug 17, 2019 22:15:54 GMT
I believe that, with matters as they are, we should take a measured, patient approach to this matter. I'm flexible and easy to work with, but let's limit the skirting to a reasonable minimum. The more people flirt with the line, missteps become likeier and likeier*. *Is likeier even a real word? I'm sure there HAS to be something, but it's looking funny to me. Misspelling, probably. I believe that, in light of the measured evolution of the English language, there would be some justification for rational exuberance regarding that word, despite the incorrect spelling. OOC: "Likelier" is the correct spelling. And did you mean for me to Fedspeakify that? |
|
|
|
Post by Transfermium on Aug 17, 2019 22:34:39 GMT
[Disclaimer: This is kinda political, but it's too silly to not ask. Tolbethessar, feel free to remove.] Regarding the likely plans of the current Administration to procure Greenland sometime in the foreseeable future: will the bounties of exploitable resources of the region, accessible currently or future-wise, further the mission of our government to drain the proverbial swamp and reinvigorate the nation's economy from its possible future recession, or is the most advantageous solution still to encourage the exploration of the existence of "individuals of presidential relevance", "campaign-relevant incidents of possible Muscovite/Eurasian origin" and "ideas in presidential consideration" by various communities and media outlets to divert hoi polloi perception of the Administration from the continued inplementation of other methods of economic revitalisation? |
|
|
|
Post by Dr. Hendrei Gromsinger on Aug 17, 2019 22:47:39 GMT
[Disclaimer: This is kinda political, but it's too silly to not ask. Tolbethessar , feel free to remove.] Regarding the likely plans of the current Administration to procure Greenland sometime in the foreseeable future: will the bounties of exploitable resources of the region, accessible currently or future-wise, further the mission of our government to drain the proverbial swamp and reinvigorate the nation's economy from its possible future recession, or is the most advantageous solution still to encourage the exploration of the existence of "individuals of presidential relevance", "campaign-relevant incidents of possible Muscovite/Eurasian origin" and "ideas in presidential consideration" by various communities and media outlets to divert hoi polloi perception of the Administration from the continued inplementation of other methods of economic revitalisation? I suspect, myself, that as the position of Greenland appears to be stable, our assessment of the situation should be data-dependent and patient. I do not believe it would be prudent to proceed and assess the impacts of this policy for a considerable time. |
|
lol
