|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Feb 18, 2019 18:03:05 GMT
Two memes about the 'Nam flashbacks |
|
|
|
Post by tpc on Feb 18, 2019 22:10:11 GMT
If it isn't clear yet, buffs from Space Race are allocated next turn. I thought the space race buffs would be applied to the phase after the one they're in (as in 1953 2nd applies to 1954 1st), so in this case you would be using the buffs from the first phase right now, right? Or is it more of 1 year later (two phases later), so it's 1953 2nd applying to 1954 2nd, and then 1954 1st applying to 1955 1st? I'm just asking for clarification.
On a side note: I've inserted the start date in the top of the announcement on page 1. For the benefit of outside readers (and for ourseleves when this RP is over and any of us wishes to go over the old threads). Yes, you're right. |
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Feb 18, 2019 23:21:39 GMT
I thought the space race buffs would be applied to the phase after the one they're in (as in 1953 2nd applies to 1954 1st), so in this case you would be using the buffs from the first phase right now, right? Or is it more of 1 year later (two phases later), so it's 1953 2nd applying to 1954 2nd, and then 1954 1st applying to 1955 1st? I'm just asking for clarification.
On a side note: I've inserted the start date in the top of the announcement on page 1. For the benefit of outside readers (and for ourseleves when this RP is over and any of us wishes to go over the old threads). Yes, you're right. , that's ambiguous. It was a "the one or the other" question. |
|
|
|
Post by tpc on Feb 19, 2019 10:05:44 GMT
One phase later.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Feb 21, 2019 16:50:37 GMT
Just let you all know in advance that I'm posting tonight. (I doubt evening hours, but if not, at least late-night for sure)Edit: Failure on my part, enough said. My apologies  |
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Feb 21, 2019 18:36:03 GMT
*SV goes nuts against Communism*
*Communism goes nuts against SV*
|
|
|
|
Post by Europyrealm on Feb 22, 2019 19:08:13 GMT
Concerning Geneva Conference, is PRC a part of Indochina side? 3 rolls for influence, right? Wanted to ensure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Feb 22, 2019 21:01:31 GMT
Concerning Geneva Conference, is PRC a part of Indochina side? 3 rolls for influence, right? Wanted to ensure. PRC, USSR and NV are in the Commie Camp. SV and the USA are in the anti-communist camp. And yes, 3 rolls. |
|
|
|
Post by tpc on Feb 24, 2019 14:06:21 GMT
I'll give those who haven't posted until Wednesday to write a turn/ask for an extension/provide an explanation.
|
|
|
|
Post by Santa Anna on Feb 24, 2019 18:20:05 GMT
I've been in and out of the hospital visiting a family member, among other school-related things lately, so I've had a reason to not post yet. But my turns will be up by tonight, I promise.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Feb 25, 2019 6:16:10 GMT
Santa Anna, how many men did I lose in your attacks (in total)? Really got them Commies running for their lives in the end though. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Frederick the Great on Feb 25, 2019 7:48:47 GMT
Added this paragraph to my latest turn. Diplomacy: Requests from the South Korean government for military assistance are approved and as a result, the White Horse Division (9th Korean Infantry Division) is shipped out to Saigon and is tasked with the defence of Saigon. Monetary compensation will be given to the Korean government in return on a yearly basis.
Frederick the Great , this action is under consideration. Do not consider it done. - tpc . |
|
|
|
Post by tpc on Feb 25, 2019 13:28:00 GMT
A reminder: you're expected to actually negotiate (present terms, compromise) in the Geneva Conference. The roll mechanics only simulate the alignment of UK and France in the agreement process.
|
|
|
|
Post by tpc on Feb 25, 2019 13:37:00 GMT
I forgot to add, since we are having peace negotiations in the RP timeline, do consider if starting offensives in (presumably) a ceasefire to provide time for negotiations would be the wisest step.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tolbethessar on Feb 25, 2019 14:06:59 GMT
I forgot to add, since we are having peace negotiations in the RP timeline, do consider if starting offensives in (presumably) a ceasefire to provide time for negotiations would be the wisest step. That brings up a question for North Vietnam's attacks. I wasn't sure if it's okay for USA to feel provoked enough by the flagrant violations committed in those attacks to the point of... like demanding that the envoy of NV be thrown out of the conference due to gross disregard of internationally accepted guidelines of cease-fires and bilateral negotiation conferences. Sounds reasonable to punish, yuus?  Edit: I've completed my three rolls for France's influence and PRC's humiliation. (This is entirely separate from the NV thing, which still needs an answer, tpc) |
|
